Home » Jury on suspected cop-killer case had ‘agreement’ to acquit before judge declared mistrial, lawyers claim

Jury on suspected cop-killer case had ‘agreement’ to acquit before judge declared mistrial, lawyers claim

by John Jefferson
0 comment

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Lawyers for the suspected Boston cop killer Karen Read said Monday that jurors in her trial over the death of John O’Keefe had an “agreement” to find her not guilty before the judge declared a mistrial. 

They raised the issue in a motion to dismiss second-degree murder charges and leaving the scene of an accident, according to Boston 25, which published the filing.

Three of the 12 jurors sent “unsolicited communications” to the defense, purportedly “indicating in no uncertain terms that the jury had a firm 12-0 agreement that Ms. Read was not guilty of two of the three charges,” her lawyers wrote.

KAREN READ MURDER CASE ENDS WITH ‘DEEPLY DIVIDED’ JURY’S DECISION

The 44-year-old Read’s trial ended after five days of deliberations last week when Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial over what jurors described as their inability to come to a unanimous verdict, however. 

SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER

John O'Keefe in his police uniform

“Despite our commitment, we are deeply divided by fundamental differences,” jurors wrote in a note to the judge. “No lack of understanding or effort. Consensus is not reachable.”

O’Keefe, Read’s boyfriend at the time, died during a snowstorm in January 2022 after Read allegedly hit him with her SUV and drove off, leaving him to die outside the home of another officer.

Karen Read smiles as defense attorney David Yannett speaks to reporters in front of Norfolk Superior Court

WATCH: DASHCAM FROM THE NIGHT JOHN O’KEEFE WAS FOUND DEAD

GET REAL TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB 

Karen Read, right, looks up as defense attorney Alan Jackson, center, speaks to reporters

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

A key conflict between the defense and prosecution was whether she hit him intentionally – or even knew she hit him at all.

Read claimed that O’Keefe’s influential police colleagues set her up as the fall person.

Prosecutors, however, argued that the two had an alcohol-fueled argument on the night of his death.

Judge Beverly Cannone presides over jury selection during the Karen Read trial at Norfolk County Superior Court

“Despite our commitment to the duty entrusted in us, we find ourselves deeply divided by fundamental differences in our opinions and state of mind,” the jury wrote in its final note to the judge last Monday.

Prosecutors have said they plan to seek a new trial. Read’s lawyers countered with a constitutional double jeopardy argument, claiming that the jury had effectively rendered a not guilty verdict on at least two charges.

Fox News’ Stepheny Price and Chris Eberhart contributed to this report.



Read the full article here

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Our Company

True Battle is your one-stop website for the latest politics news from the US and the World, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get the latest political news, articles & new reports. Let's stay updated!

Laest News

© Copyright 2023 – All Right Reserved

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy